August 26, 2009
During Legion Convention Speech, Shinseki Outlines "Ambitious" Goals
For VA.
The AP (8/26) reports US Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki
"says too few veterans are participating in VA programs, and too
often those veterans face long waits to have claims processed. In a
speech to the American Legion's national convention in Louisville,"
Shinseki "outlined goals to increase participation and reduce claims
backlogs." He "says that President Barack Obama wants an electronic
records system developed that will mean faster claims processing
with fewer errors." Shinseki also "says VA is pursuing aggressive
outreach efforts," and in "another ambitious goal," he "says he
wants to end homelessness among...veterans."
The
Louisville Courier-Journal (8/26, Yetter) also covers
Shinseki's speech, although it first took note of an address made at
the convention by "Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs
of staff," who focused his comments on Afghanistan. Shinseki,
meanwhile, "told Legion members that his focus is to improve
services for veterans - including cutting the backlog of benefit
claims, upgrading health services and eliminating the shameful
problem of the estimated 131,000 homeless veterans in America.
'We're going to take those 131,000 veterans off the streets in the
next five years,' said Shinseki," adding, "I know what a tall order
that is." The Secretary, however, "said he believes it can be
accomplished with better health care - including mental health and
substance abuse treatment, education, job-training and housing
assistance."
Impact:
Sec. Shinseki speech
VA To Apologize For ALS Notification Errors.
The
AP (8/26, Dickerscheid) reports the US Department of Veterans
Affairs "will personally apologize to veterans who received
erroneous letters saying they had been diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's
disease, agency spokeswoman Katie Roberts said Tuesday." The vets
will also "receive an explanation about how 'this...regrettable
error' occurred and reassurances that the letters do not confirm
diagnoses of the fatal neurological disease, she said." Roberts
"said the VA mailed more than 1,800 letters last week and has been
notified by less than 10 veterans who received the letters in
error," but the National Gulf War Resource Center, a "Gulf War
veterans group that provides information, support and referrals
about illnesses to military" members, "estimates at least 1,200
veterans received the letters by mistake." The
Philadelphia Inquirer (8/26, 339K) runs a shortened version of
this AP story as the lead item in its "In the Nation" column.
Fox News' Special Report (8/25, 6:36 p.m. ET) aired a similar story.
Meanwhile, during an interview with Fox News' Happening Now (8/25, 11:42 a.m. ET), Gulf War vet Brent
Casey, one of those whom the VA mistakenly notified, said that when
he got his letter, he thought he "had received a death sentence."
Fox News added that some of the vets who received the letter in
error "underwent a battery of painful and expensive tests," a point
also made by MSNBC's Morning Show (8/25, 6:13 a.m. ET), which said the VA is
"blaming a computer glitch" for the errant notices.
MSNBC Live (8/25, 11:34 a.m. ET) also aired a report on this story, as did Fox News' Fox And Friends (8/25, 6:32 a.m. ET) and
CNN's Newsroom (8/25), whose host, Kyra Phillips, said "these ongoing screw-ups at the VA are breaking my heart." Phillips added, "In just the past year, we've told you about
dirty colonoscopy equipment at VA hospitals exposing thousands of our vets to HIV and hepatitis. Then the VA medical center in Philadelphia disclosed that it gave at least 98 vets incorrect
radiation doses for cancer," and "now this mistake."
Impact:
Errant health notification to Veterans
Veterans Care Manual Continues To Spark Debate.
In continuing coverage, MSNBC Live (8/25, 4:43 p.m. ET, 1.39M) aired a "Face Off"
segment on the "growing mountain of misinformation finding its way
into the debate over healthcare reform." According to MSNBC, "the
conservative media in pushing the false claim that government-run
healthcare, as evidenced by the Veterans Administration, will mean
death books that push seniors to choose euthanasia. Here's the
truth: The document is actually called 'Your Life, Your Choices,'"
and it is "a 52-page optional guidebook for veterans. It is about
living wills and end-of-life care," and it has "been in use since
1997, with the Bush Administration being the one that had its VA
issue a directive in 2007 to list the book as an example of the type
of document doctors should give their patients if requested."
Later in the "Face Off" segment, when MSNBC Live (8/25, 4:49 p.m. ET, 1.39M) asked Republican
strategist K.T. McFarland about recent criticisms of the document, she said, "I don't think we are going to throw GI Joe under the bus"
in terms of healthcare reform. The
Washington Times (8/26), however, disagreed, saying in an editorial that bureaucratic "disregard for the value of all life is insinuated in a government manual known as 'the Death Book,'" which
the Times says "is instructive as a reflection on Obamacare priorities." The Times concludes, "Concern about rationing has been particularly acute among the elderly for good reason. The Death Book
shows government's perverse interest in the end of life rather than its extension."
The
NPR (8/25, Shapiro) website also took note of the controversy
surrounding the veterans care guidebook, and this coverage was noted
by Ed O'Keefe, who, in the final item for his
Washington Post (8/25) "Federal Eye" blog, published a
question from a reader who was surprised to find NPR "treating the
'VA Death Book' accusation seriously. The people who throw this
stuff up aren't serious about it, why do the journalists who cover
it have to take them seriously?" In response, O'Keefe said the story
is an "example of how the Obama administration is forced to address
or reconcile with a Bush-era policy decision." He added, "Remember
-- end-of-life planning is common, not just for veterans but for
everyday folks." O'Keefe also wrote about this topic in another
"Federal Eye" blog for the
Washington Post (8/25), this time saying that the
guidebook issue has come up after "a rough few months" for the VA,
"which faces several scandals related to the medical care and
benefits provided to veterans, the illegal behavior of former
officials and headaches caused by policies started during the Bush
administration."
Impact:
End of Life guidance document